This case explores the accounting treatment for embedded derivatives of China Evergrande Group (HKEx: 3333). It had been the second-largest property developer in China by property sales and largest by land reserves and borrowing size.

On 24 September 2020, a suspicious "letter" was widely circulated on the Internet. The stock price plunged. The “letter” was purportedly sent by Evergrande to the Chinese government, urging the approval of a “listing plan” which was crucial in the “reorganization plan” of the Group.

Back in December 2016, Evergrande used this plan to attract new “strategic investors” (SIs) to inject capital. To attract SIs, Evergrande and the SIs had agreed that if the reorganization could not be executed by 31 January 2021, the SIs could exercise either one of the two rights. One right was to demand Evergrande to repurchase their shares. Another right was to demand Evergrande to compensate 50% of their shares. Later the SIs invested RMB130,000mn in total, instantly enabling Evergrande to alleviate liquidity strains and continued to expand aggressively by leverage.

Was the RMB130,000mn properly accounted for in financial statements, despite RMB2,500mn of “financial derivative liability” throughout 2017 to 2020? Should the two “rights” be treated as “options” in accounting?